Heart-brain interactions


 

To optimally adapt to constantly changing environments, our internal and external milieus are coupled: bodily signals (e.g., proprioceptive or interoceptive / viscerosensory) are continuously integrated with exteroceptive sensory input (e.g., visual or auditory).
The bidirectional communication between the heart and the brain constitutes a major body-brain axis. In collaboration with other groups in the department (Somatosensory, NID), we study brain-heart coupling and its link to mental phenomena, particularly emotions or stress.
 

Heart rate variability, emotions and stress 

Heart rate variability, emotions and stress
 

Parasympathetic signals originating in the brain underlie adaptive beat-to-beat changes in the heart rate. This heart rate variability (HRV) can be measured at rest or during a task (e.g., stress induction). We found resting HRV to be linked to functional brain connectivity in cortical midline structures (Kumral et al., 2019) as well as to cortical thickness in orbitofrontal cortex (Koenig et al., 2021).

Key publications:
Kumral, D. et al. (2019). The age-dependent relationship between resting heart rate variability and functional brain connectivity. NeuroImage, 185, 521–533.

Koenig, J., et al. (2021). Cortical thickness and resting‐state cardiac function across the lifespan: A cross‐sectional pooled mega‐analysis. Psychophysiology, 58(7).

 
Cardiac-cycle dependent perception and action

Cardiac-cycle dependent perception and action

The heartbeat also influences how we perceive our environment and how we interact with it. We investigate such cardiac cycle time effects in the visual, somatosensory, and motor domain. The cardiac cycle can be divided into systole, when the heart muscle contracts to eject blood into the arteries, and diastole, when the heart (re-)fills with blood.
We found that people are more likely to prompt a briefly presented photo they’re asked to memorize during systole compared to diastole. The functional relevance of this bias is still unclear as this preference did not influence how well they remembered it (Kunzendorf et al., 2019).
In several independent studies, we also observed that near-threshold somatosensory stimuli are more likely to be detected when they are presented at later phases of the cardiac cycle (diastole).

Key publications:
Kunzendorf, S., Klotzsche, F., Akbal, M., Villringer, A., Ohl, S., & Gaebler, M. (2019). Active information sampling varies across the cardiac cycle. Psychophysiology, 56(5), e13322.

Motyka, P., Grund, M., Forschack, N., Al, E., Villringer, A., & Gaebler, M. (2019). Interactions between cardiac activity and conscious somatosensory perception. Psychophysiology, 56(10), e13424.

Al, E., Iliopoulos, F., Forschack, N., Nierhaus, T., Grund, M., Motyka, P., Gaebler, M., Nikulin, V. V., & Villringer, A. (2020). Heart–brain interactions shape somatosensory perception and evoked potentials. PNAS, 201915629.

 
Go to Editor View